European Union Cyclists' Group

Home » Safe cycling

Safe cycling

Traffic in Brussels is stressful. Many streets and intersections are poorly designed and/or poorly maintained. Enforcement of traffic laws is erratic and not focussed on road safety. The main concern seems to be to keep cars moving instead of creating a safe and attractive environment for people to live, work and play as well getting from a to b on foot, by bicycle or public transport safely. (Cycling priority 2)

The bicycle routes decided in 1995 are far from being completed. Many bicycle lanes and paths are designed and/or maintained in such a way that cycling there is unpleasant and unsafe. Completing and maintaining these routes should be the top priority. Other road infrastructure that facilitates cycling, including 30km/h zones, home zones and bicycle streets should be promoted. (Cycling priority 4)

Out and about

City cycling is always more enjoyable, and safer, when there is less motor traffic and especially where there is not fast traffic. Cycle commuters almost always find ways to get to work that avoid the fastest or the most congested roads, even though such routes may take longer.

Rules of the road

Here is a helpful  one page summary about the rules and tips for cycling in Belgium (code, habits)-

“Les cyclistes et le code” (40 pages) is free to download to download here

This is another helpful booklet about all the relevant traffic rules about cycling in Belgium. Here are some videos .

Cycle paths

Bike lanes painted in the road come in two flavours. You are obliged to use the ones marked with broken white lines, unless something either prevents you from using it or would make it dangerous to use. The Rond Point Schuman has a cycle path of this kind that is almost always impossible to use.

A circular blue panel with a white bicycle logo indicates that you must use the cycle path if the sign is visible in your direction — some cycle paths are two-way. Be careful on these cycle paths. You will be sharing them with pedestrians, dogs, and, in some cases, cars driving across them for access. Accident statistics show that cycle paths shared in this way with other road users are actually slightly less safe for the cyclist than a normal road, but almost all the cycle path accidents happen at junctions. The most dangerous part of a cycle path is where it crosses a road because motorists don’t always realise that a bike may suddenly appear in front of them. Many cyclists, however, assume that the cycle path gives them the right of way across the intersection – but it doesn’t.

The other kind of cycle path on the road is shown by a white cycle logo on a red strip of tarmac along the side of the road. This has no legal meaning at all, either for the cyclist or the motorist. It is merely a warning to motorists to watch out for cyclists – something that they should do anyway.

Since December 2012, a new law on rues cyclables has been in force.  Although cars may use these routes cyclists have priority.

More information

On the roads

Biking in Brussels is not greatly different from riding a bike in any other city. If a cyclist is injured in an accident, it is almost always because a car or other motorised vehicle was involved. Motorists look ahead and to the side for other vehicles. They don’t expect to see a fast-moving bicycle doing something odd. You are safest when you use your bicycle as you would any other vehicle, and ride where drivers expect to see traffic.

Staying safe is largely a matter of

  • knowing the traffic code, especially the meaning of signs and markings specifically for cyclists, and obeying the rules (unless in some unusual circumstance they force you into danger!).
  • observing road conditions, including wet leaves, tram lines, and modifying your behaviour to take them into account ;
  • paying close and careful attention to the behaviour of other road users, including people inside parked cars and people walking their dogs ;
  • making sure that you can see – and be seen by others. This particularly applies at night, when you must have your front and tail lights on, and should wear bright (even better: reflecting) clothes;
  • staying vigilant at all times but especially as you approach intersections.

Most accidents in which the cyclist is seriously hurt or killed involve the cyclist taking a big risk (often breaking the law at the same time). Just a few “high-risk” cyclists make it look like cycling is far more dangerous than it is and create a negative image. The single most dangerous thing you can do, from the point of view of the accident statistics, is to ride through an intersection against a red light or stop sign. Somehow that makes sense….

Another potentially dangerous – but easily avoidable – situation is finding yourself between a big vehicle (truck) and the kerb: You are very likely to be in the driver’s dead angle, and you wouldn’t wish to find your traject been crossed by his at the same moment…  Simply remember the old African saying: “Never get between the hippo and the water”.  So: stay behind!

One-way streets 

SUL (Sens Unique Limité) or BEV (Beperkt Eenrichtings Verkeer) are one-way streets open for cyclists in both directions. They are signposted with a board displaying a bicycle with two arrows going up and down under the blue square “one way” plate on one side, and an “excepté/uitgezonderd [cyclists]” board under the red “no entrance” sign on the other.

They make life considerably easier for cyclists who can avoid unproductive detours.

For more info click here [FR] or here [NL]


6 Comments

  1. Maddy says:

    I cycle to work everyday (since 5 years now). It is a “sense unique” street but cyclists are allowed both ways. Every morning I go down the street, in the opposite sense to the cars, as otherwise my journey would be longer (and with other dangers). In that direction the cyclist rides just close to the pavement and cannot therefore protect himself by changing the trajectory. Regularly (as often as once a week), I feel unsecure as cars go too quickly and they do not leave enough place for the cyclist in the opposite direction to ride safely – notwithstanding the 30km/h limitation. In addition there is a turn in the middle of the street and the cars that ride too quickly do not realise the presence of the cyclist behind the turn early enough to accommodate their trajectory accordingly. I believe there is a road safety problem: there are many Commission cyclists as there are two Commission buildings in this street and many of them ride in that direction. I am afraid that if nothing changes, one day one of us will leave his/her leg under one of those cars wheels.

    Like

  2. Louise says:

    Thank you keeping me on your distribution list. Although Brussels might not be the ideal location for safe cycling, I could only wish Florida had half of what I was used too in the past. There are a couple of cycling lanes but they are hardly respected and drivers, at least most of them, are very aggressive and fatal accidents with bicycles are sadly quite frequent. Those who generally ride for fun and go out for 50 our 60 km start very early in the morning as a way of avoiding as many cars as possible. I thought of doing it but I am not really the best morning person and the peak of humidity generally lasts until 9-10 am (varies from 85 to 95%). Every month the local TV stations post a note on the critical mass organized here in Fort Lauderdale on facebook and often, if not always, the comments are bad, negative, stupid, ie, ‘shame on you that you block a lane, what if an ambulance needs to go through’, ‘go cycle in a park’ or ‘get out of the road, this is for cars’. Even sidewalks for pedestrians are sometimes just a mirage… Last week I arrived a bit too early to the gym. I decided to walk from there to starbucks (both located on the same commercial plaza). As starbucks is at the entrance of the plaza and as there are no sidewalks between the latter and the rest of the stores/gym one has no choice than walking on the road… or drive 200m. A lady stops, opens the car window and starts shouting how dangerous it is, that I shouldn’t be walking on the road (as you can imagine I was not walking right in the middle of the road). I did end up by telling her off something along the lines of ‘do you actually see a sidewalk where I can WALK ON IT???’. Well not all is bad. Weather is great, I live at walking distance from the beach and so far no hurricanes to make our life complicated…

    Like

  3. Miranda says:

    You post very interesting articles here. Your blog deserves
    much more visitors. It can go viral if you give it initial boost, i know useful tool that can help you, simply type in google: svetsern traffic tips

    Like

  4. P Weinheimer says:

    The whole city is a shame for cyclists; some times large sidewalks and just a red painted lane on the street for cyclists; deep holes and other obstacles like destroyed pavement; add to this allowing cyclists using one way streets opposite where you have a strong curve to the left where it is impossible for a car driver to see a cyclist in time; eg landschapschildersstraat auderghem; I suggest that the responsible persons in Brussels take their bike, drive to the railwaystation and visit this city

    http://www.muenster.de/stadt/stadtplanung/radverkehr.html

    Like

  5. An intriguing discussion is worth comment. I do believe that you ought to publish
    more on this issue, it might not be a taboo subject
    but typically folks don’t speak about these topics.
    To the next! All the best!!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: